Serena Gray's Blog

Some see it as DevOps vs. Agile while others see them as two sides of the same methodology coin. Others would say Agile empowers DevOps to exist. Back in 2009, more IT professionals started to move away from the traditional waterfall method and adopt nonlinear agile methodology by creating each development stage independent and incorporating continuous testing early on and throughout the growth cycle (see the next half of the manual for a glossary of terms which goes into more detail): Consequently, this strategy enhanced efficiency and reduced risk by allowing developers to make immediate changes before shipping to production depending on the continuous feedback they have received. While agile procedures had always enhanced development, there was still a discrepancy at the flow as it came to installation, which still embraced the waterfall strategy.  While development utilized agile to reduced risk and improve efficiency, deployment hung on to the linear waterfall cons

Automated testing isalso well, automated. This differs from manual testing in which a human being is liable for single-handedly testing the performance of the software from how a user would. Since automated testing is done through an automation tool, less time is needed in exploratory tests and much more time is required in keeping test scripts while raising overall test coverage. The benefit of manual testing is that it allows an individual brain to draw insights from a test which may otherwise be missed by an automated testing program. Automated testing is well-suited for big projects; projects that need testing exactly the same areas over and over; and jobs that have already been through an initial manual testing procedure. Implementing a Test Automation Plan The move to agile has led many clubs to embrace a pyramid testing plan. The test automation pyramid strategy involves automating tests at three distinct levels. Unit testing represents the foundation and largest

The integration testing definition refers to analysing the communication between separate software modules. Normally, the project team has to unit test the machine before moving on to integration testing. From the software development life cycle, integration testing is the next step. The main aim of integration testing is to make sure the differences in logic patterns developers use when creating a module do not undermine the connectivity of the system. There are several methods to integration testing: In case one of those modules isn't ready for testing yet, QA teams use stubs. Bottom-up integration testing is the contrary method to top-down integration testing. It implies validating basic modules first and integrating the complex ones later. The rationale behind the strategy is that it requires less time to make a low-level module -- that is why such components should be tested even if the more complex areas of the system are still in evolution. Big bang. If the t

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) is a type of testing performed from the end-user or the customer to verify/accept the software system before moving the software application to the manufacturing environment. UAT is completed in the final period of testing after operational, integration, and system testing is done. The most important purpose of UAT is to confirm the end to end business stream. It does NOT focus on Cosmetic errors, Spelling mistakes, or System testing. User Acceptance Testing is completed in a different testing environment with a production-like information setup. It's a type of black-box testing in which two or more end-users will be involved. Who Performs  UAT ? The need for User Acceptance Testing: Once the software has undergone Unit, Integration, and System testing the need for Acceptance Testing might seem redundant. However, Acceptance Testing is needed because Developers code applications based on requirements document that is their"o

As application development practices progressively tendency towards Agile development and DevOps, Continuous Integration and Delivery have come to be the go-to procedures for receiving fast responses, meeting changing requirements, and optimizing quality. But what precisely is CI/CD and just how does testing fit in? As more organizations embrace these practices, a few will increase testing, while others will allow it to fall through the cracks. Figure out how teams are including constant integration testing to equilibrium speed and quality more efficiently. Continuous Integration is a clinic where a team of developers intermittently merges their code changes into a shared repository. Developers are incorporating numerous times throughout the day and committing to changes about once per day or a couple of times a week. Continuous Integration is favored by software teams since it allows daily constant feedback in growth from all contributors, while it's easier to catch