Serena Gray's Blog

Smoke testing is explicitly helping many teams in ensuring that the critical and major functionalities of the application are working before it is released for end-users. This method is a functional testing type and also known as the Build verification process. By including smoke testing into the software testing lifecycle (STLC), developers and testers experience several benefits such as saving time and effort, improvement in the effectiveness, etc. Thus, it is essential for the teams to have a clear understanding of smoke testing. For any software project, the main objective is to deliver a quality and high-performing application at a faster speed with cost savings. Thus, to achieve this, there is a huge need for the teams to perform software testing, make sure that the application is defect-free and all major functionalities are working fine before its release. One of such testing methodology that effectively helps is Smoke testing. Yes, smoke testing is one type of functional test...

Web performance is a broad topic, and you will find no lack of performance testing tips and tutorials all around the net. Before beginning tuning your site or application, you have to first figure out which metrics matter to your own users and establish a few achievable benchmarks. What is performance testing?  In the context of web development, performance testing entails using software tools to simulate the way the application runs under particular conditions. After the word"performance" is heard, most people instantly think of the rate. Fast load times and response times are absolutely necessary these days, but you have to consider the larger picture, which requires more than simply clicking through all your links to be certain they work. Just because everything works flawlessly during production testing does not mean that will be the situation as soon as your site is flooded with traffic. What are the advantages of performance testing?  Testing the operation of your site ...

The disagreement over whether to write a unit test or an end-to-end evaluation for an element of a software system is something I have encountered a number of times. It mostly appears as a philosophical conversation along the lines when we can only write one test for this feature, should we write a unit test or an end-to-end test? Basically, time and resources are limited, so what type of test would be most effective? In this article, I'll provide my view on this question. I must be aware that my experience has been in building software infrastructure for industrial applications -- streaming data system for near-real-time data. For someone who has worked in another domain, where calculating and analysing the whole software process is simpler, or at which the functional environment is more forgiving of mistake, I could understand the way their experience might be different. I've worked on hosted solutions in addition to infrastructure that's installed on-premises and operate...

Learning to build code, if through self-study or a computer science degree, isn't the same as learning how to construct applications, especially in a changing company setting. Your research may have instructed you what code has to be composed to construct a better piece of software, however, they probably did not teach you the way a team of engineers should think about writing that code. How does the work get divvied up? What does the development cycle look like? How can quality management work? Over the past 60 decades, many methodologies have tried to define exactly how teams can maximise their software development, however, the one which reigns supreme--at least over the past twenty years--is the agile methodology. Emphasising speed, adaptability, and user-centric layout, the agile technique is the backbone of contemporary software development. Most of the popular project management tools you've likely used (like Trello and Jira) are based entirely on their features. If you...

As the name implies, Test Automation (TA) is the procedure for analysing a unit or several components of software utilising a separate software tool to automatically execute test scripts from the target software program. The testing tool measures the topic communicating through the various required functions using test cases developed by the users and users to ensure the goal coding generates the expected effects. Generally, the testing tools will also create a report of the test outcomes. Why Use Automated Testing? The main benefit of Automated testing is the ability to repeatedly test software scripts. Every step in a script is obviously included. Unless modified by the tester, each value is always exactly the exact same and each outcome is always recorded. If implemented properly, automated testing provides several benefits. The first, and most obvious is that the ability to test twenty-four hours a day, seven days per week without having aide opting for the exact same...

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) is an important part of the development procedure. If carried out as soon as possible and as often as you can, it doesn't just alert the development group to facets which don't yet fulfill the demands of the users but also gives governance a much better idea of advancement. If UAT is postponed, flaws become expensive and troublesome to repair. That is why it is such a significant part of the delivery process. UAT can be carried out using an agile approach. In Agile, it is not a different phase, but rather an iterative alliance between all the project stakeholders, ensuring constant evaluation and feedback cycles. For User Acceptance testing, a Requirements Subject Matter Expert (Requirements SME), or company Domain pro, ensures the prerequisites proceeds, throughout the delivery process, to be properly understood and recorded within the delivery team. These can then be confirmed by means of UAT. It removes unpleasant surprises after dis...

Some see it as DevOps vs. Agile while others see them as two sides of the same methodology coin. Others would say Agile empowers DevOps to exist. Back in 2009, more IT professionals started to move away from the traditional waterfall method and adopt nonlinear agile methodology by creating each development stage independent and incorporating continuous testing early on and throughout the growth cycle (see the next half of the manual for a glossary of terms which goes into more detail): Consequently, this strategy enhanced efficiency and reduced risk by allowing developers to make immediate changes before shipping to production depending on the continuous feedback they have received. While agile procedures had always enhanced development, there was still a discrepancy at the flow as it came to installation, which still embraced the waterfall strategy.  While development utilized agile to reduced risk and improve efficiency, deployment hung on to the linear waterfall ...